Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Workplace Health Saf ; 69(10): 448-454, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1287256

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the United States, millions of people contract the flu each year. Immunization has been shown to provide the best protection against the flu. Increasing flu vaccination rates can reduce the number of patients who get the flu and seek care for non-specific symptoms thus making detection of the coronavirus more efficient. METHOD: A quality improvement project was implemented to increase the number of influenza vaccines received by employees at an onsite employer-based health clinic. Anonymous pre- and post-surveys were used to assess the flu knowledge of employees. Employees from a large financial group, who voluntarily participated, received an educational handout at the onsite health fair or at a lunch and learn. Full-time employees who carried their employer's health insurance were eligible to participate, whereas, dependents and contract employees were excluded. FINDINGS: The number of employees who received the vaccination increased during the fall of 2019 (n = 406) when compared with the previous year (n = 337). Nineteen percent (n = 170) of employees completed surveys. There were statistically significantly more post- than pre-survey responses reflecting the participants' perceived knowledge of influenza and the flu vaccine. The majority of participants in both the pre- and post-surveys reported that they learned "a lot" about both influenza and the flu vaccine. CONCLUSION: Providing education and access to the vaccine in the workplace may improve flu knowledge, reduce barriers, and increase flu vaccine uptake among employees.


Asunto(s)
Programas de Inmunización/organización & administración , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Servicios de Salud del Trabajador/organización & administración , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Vacunación/economía , Adulto Joven
2.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 18(7): 334-344, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1254232

RESUMEN

Homemade cloth masks and other improvised face coverings have become widespread during the COVID-19 pandemic driven by severe shortages of personal protective equipment. In this study, various alternative (mostly common household) materials, which have not traditionally been used in respiratory protective devices, were tested for particle filtration performance and breathability. Most of these materials were found of some-but rather limited-utility in facemasks. At a breathing flow rate of 30 L min-1, 17 out of 19 tested materials demonstrated collection efficiency below 50%; at 85 L min-1, only one material featured particle collection efficiency above 50%. Pressure drop values were mostly below 4 mm w.g. (observed in 89% of cases for the two flow rates), which provides comfortable breathing. Only for one fabric material (silk) tested at 85 L min-1 did the pressure drop reach 11 mm w.g. Based on these results, a three-layer facemask prototype was designed and fabricated comprised of the best performing materials. Additional tests were conducted to examine possible particle detachment/shedding from the materials used in the newly developed facemask, but no such phenomenon was observed. The prototype was evaluated on 10 human subjects using the standard OSHA-approved quantitative fit testing protocol. The mask protection level, determined as an adopted fit factor, was found to lie between that of the two commercial surgical/medical masks tested for comparison. A 10-cycle washing of the mask prototype lowered its collection efficiency across the particle size range; however, washing did not substantially affect mask breathability. The study revealed that although homemade masks offer a certain level of protection to a wearer, one should not expect them to provide the same respiratory protection as high-end commercial surgical/medical masks or-by any means-NIOSH-certified N95 filtering facepieces.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Diseño de Equipo , Filtración/instrumentación , Máscaras/normas , Ensayo de Materiales , Humanos , Máscaras/provisión & distribución , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Tamaño de la Partícula , Equipo de Protección Personal/normas , Equipo de Protección Personal/provisión & distribución , Respiración , Dispositivos de Protección Respiratoria/normas , Dispositivos de Protección Respiratoria/provisión & distribución , SARS-CoV-2 , Textiles
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA